Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Warren Davidson | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Ohio

RIncumbent

Warren Davidson

U.S. House · Ohio

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophySupport

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionOppose

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

SupportHigh

Sept 2025 op-ed argues "Congress needs to act proactively -- not reactively -- to protect the American people by passing comprehensive frameworks to address concerns with AI." Frames privacy as the "base layer for ethical AI" and criticizes Congress for not having "written any rules to safeguard humans from AI."

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

OpposeHigh

Praised the Senate's 99-1 vote to remove the 10-year state AI preemption moratorium from the original House version of the One Big Beautiful Bill, calling it a "wise" decision -- a signal he opposes broad federal preemption of state AI laws.

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology