Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Victoria Isabel Broderick | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Tennessee

Victoria Isabel Broderick

U.S. House · Tennessee

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyNo mention

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetySupport

Data CentersUnclear

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionSupport

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

Children's Online Safety

Views on protecting minors from harms related to AI or AI-mediated platforms.

SupportMedium

Says "AI is a tool, and guardrails need to be put in place to protect workers and their jobs, minors’ privacy, and images"

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

UnclearMedium

Says the government should "address environmental concerns, the community strain these cause and ensure the center owners are paying their fair share in the profits they make"

Source: Statement · harshbarger.house.gov

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

SupportMedium

Says "AI is a tool, and guardrails need to be put in place to protect workers and their jobs, minors’ privacy, and images"

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Oct 18, 2026

Methodology