Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Scott Fitzgerald | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Wisconsin

RIncumbent

Scott Fitzgerald

U.S. House · Wisconsin

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyOppose

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetySupport

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionSupport

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

OpposeMedium

"Over-regulation (of AI) can kill innovation. When the government inserts itself too early, it locks in incumbents, drives up costs, and freezes the market, startups get squeezed, the rules benefit the insiders."

Children's Online Safety

Views on protecting minors from harms related to AI or AI-mediated platforms.

SupportHigh

Voted "Yes" on TAKE IT DOWN Act

Source: Statement · clerk.house.gov

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

SupportMedium

Voted for H.R. 1 (House passage contained the state-AI moratorium)

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Oct 18, 2026

Methodology