Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Sam Liccardo | AI on the Ballot

←Back to California

Sam Liccardo

U.S. House · California

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyUnclear

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionSupport

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

UnclearMedium

He was endorsed by Leading the Future, a pro-AI super PAC with more than $100M from OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Andreessen Horowitz, and Palantir, whose stated agenda is to take regulatory power from states and leave it with the federal government.

Source: Statement · facebook.com

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

SupportMedium

Source: Statement · washingtonreporter.news

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Oct 18, 2026

Methodology