Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Nicholas A. "Nick" Langworthy | AI on the Ballot

←Back to New York

RIncumbent

Nicholas A. "Nick" Langworthy

U.S. House · New York

Export Control and Compute GovernanceMixed

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyOppose

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionSupport

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

Export Control and Compute Governance

Government control or restriction of advanced AI capabilities through trade, export, or compute access.

MixedMedium

Couples an anti-regulation stance with a hawkish China-competition framing.

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

OpposeHigh

Frames AI over-regulation as ceding ground to China; favors a light-touch federal approach.

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

SupportHigh

Co-sent a letter (with Rep. Gabe Evans) to Commerce Secretary Lutnick opposing state AI laws including Colorado's SB 205 and NY's RAISE Act: "We cannot allow a patchwork of burdensome state regulations to weaken our competitive edge... Creating uniform federal standards are essential." Source: gabeevans.house.gov.

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology