AI Regulation Philosophy
A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.
Focuses on regulation as means to preventing costs and power imbalances from being shifted onto workers & communities
Loading policy data...
3 positions on record
A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.
Focuses on regulation as means to preventing costs and power imbalances from being shifted onto workers & communities
Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.
His platform frames AI policy around protecting the “rights, safety, and economic security” of American workers
Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.
Says says AI regulatory authority should remain with states and localities rather than be federally preempted, particularly in relation to data-center siting, electric-grid costs, and local environmental effects
Last updated Oct 18, 2026
Methodology