Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Jay Feely | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Arizona

Jay Feely

U.S. House · Arizona

Export Control and Compute GovernanceSupport

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyNo mention

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersSupport

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

Export Control and Compute Governance

Government control or restriction of advanced AI capabilities through trade, export, or compute access.

SupportLow

Rreported to agree that the United States should invest in artificial intelligence for defense and to compete with China, as part of a shared position with rivals Chaplik and Trobough.

Source: Statement · coloradonewsline.com

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

SupportHigh

Stated that he "vehemently supports data centers" in Arizona, arguing the economic benefits outweigh the costs.

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Oct 18, 2026

Methodology