Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

A project of Evitable

Jamie Raskin | AI on the Ballot

DIncumbent

Jamie Raskin

U.S. House · Maryland

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophySupport

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetySupport

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudSupport

AI PreemptionOppose

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

4 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

SupportMedium

Urged "bipartisan action to enact basic guardrails to protect Americans from harm online."

Views on protecting minors from harms related to AI or AI-mediated platforms.

SupportMedium

Expressed concern about the effect of AI deepfakes on children at committee hearing.

Views on AI-generated misinformation, scam prevention, fraud targeting vulnerable populations, and synthetic media disclosure requirements.

SupportLow

Warned that "comprehensive federal preemption of state common law...regarding AI would.. deny victims their day in court."

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

OpposeMedium

Warned that "comprehensive federal preemption of state common law...regarding AI would..stifle innovation."

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Last updated Jul 15, 2026