Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

James "Jim" D. Jordan | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Ohio

RIncumbent

James "Jim" D. Jordan

U.S. House · Ohio

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyMixed

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionSupport

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

MixedMedium

Champions AI investigation framing centered on alleged Biden-era "censorship" pressure on AI companies; says committee is crafting "legislation to protect Americans' civil liberties from infringement amid advances in AI technology." Generally skeptical of regulation that could constrain speech but pushes targeted bills against perceived AI bias.

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

SupportMedium

As House Judiciary Chair, joined Speaker Johnson and Majority Leader Scalise in supporting the White House's March 2026 national AI policy framework, which calls for federal preemption of state AI laws to "beat China in the global AI race."

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology