Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Greg Landsman | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Ohio

DIncumbent

Greg Landsman

U.S. House · Ohio

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophySupport

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionSupport

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

SupportMedium

Has called for AI guardrails specifically in healthcare ("AI Death Panels" piece on AI denials of Medicare procedures). Has co-introduced a bill banning AI-driven Medicare denials. Generally favors targeted regulation in high-stakes verticals.

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

SupportMedium

Has emphasized workforce preparation for AI shifts; has cited estimates that "85% of jobs by 2030 have not been created yet" and discussed AI policy at U. Cincinnati 1819 Hub event with Sen. Moreno.

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology