Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

A project of Evitable

Dan Schwartz | AI on the Ballot

Dan Schwartz

U.S. House · Maryland

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyMixed

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionSupport

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionOppose

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

MixedHigh

Prioritizing "legislation that allows for innovation while protecting user information, jobs, and national security."

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

SupportLow

Policy platform prioritizes protection of jobs within AI regulation; no specific details given.

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

OpposeHigh

Policy platform emphasizes reversal of ban on state-level AI regulation.

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Last updated Jul 15, 2026