Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Connie Chan | AI on the Ballot

←Back to California

Connie Chan

U.S. House · California

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyUnclear

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersNo mention

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionSupport

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionOppose

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

UnclearLow

Said "It is the AI industry claiming that the technology is rapidly developing. I am skeptical about the technology itself and the rate of growth, which might turn out to be a tech bubble; says "AI is really automation and algorithms, maybe on steroids"; proposes regulating AI sector by sector

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

SupportLow

Regulating AI "not taking away jobs" is a stated guiding principle, but no specific mechanisms.

AI Preemption

Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.

OpposeMedium

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology