Loading policy data...
6 positions on record
Government control or restriction of advanced AI capabilities through trade, export, or compute access.
Introduced legislation requiring Congressional approval before the sale of any advanced AI chip to China
A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.
Said Congress didn't ‘put up guardrails’ around social media and that ‘we shouldn't make that same mistake with AI’
Source: Statement · calmatters.org
Positions on AI systems designed for emotional, relational, or social interaction.
Worries "a lot about this epidemic of loneliness" and that AI could enable people to have relationships with artificial beings
Views on protecting minors from harms related to AI or AI-mediated platforms.
Secured $800,000 for the Sacramento County Sheriff’s Office to upgrade forensic technology used to investigate and prevent online child exploitation
Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.
Believes that AI will augment rather than fully replace skilled human workers, at least in healthcare.
Stance on federal preemption of state AI laws, states' rights to regulate AI, and the patchwork of local vs. national regulatory approaches.
Asserts that it's the right thing for Congress to have a regulatory framework at the federal level instead of all 50 states; says that Congress should work with states to adopt a framework that could easily be adopted at the federal level
Last updated Jul 15, 2026
Methodology