Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Amanda McKinney | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Washington

Amanda McKinney

U.S. House · Washington

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyOppose

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersMixed

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

2 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

OpposeHigh

McKinney opposes "heavy-handed regulation that stifles innovation or drives jobs overseas."

Source: Statement

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

MixedHigh

Envisions data center construction governed by local permitting and land-use rules rather than special treatment. Stated that she would treat them "like any other facility that wanted to get a permit," with local communities deciding.

Source: Statement

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Oct 18, 2026

Methodology