Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Adrian Boafo | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Maryland

Adrian Boafo

U.S. House · Maryland

Export Control and Compute GovernanceNo mention

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyMixed

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersMixed

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionOppose

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

MixedHigh

Belives that "innovation policy should be guided by the public interest"; aims to "ensure the United States remains the pro-innovation capital of the world."

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

MixedHigh

Supports "responsible investment in data centers" that "creates...economic growth while ensuring companies pay their fair share."

Jobs and Workforce Disruption

Positions on AI-driven job displacement, reskilling programs, unemployment policy, and tax policy for distributing AI-driven wealth.

OpposeLow

Advocates for technology infrastructure that creates jobs.

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology