Map
About
Submit Correction

Loading policy data...

AI on the Ballot

Nonpartisan research tracking where U.S. Congressional candidates in the 2026 midterm elections stand on artificial intelligence policy.

Navigate

About Methodology Corrections Contact

A project of Evitable

@v1naya

Aaron Flint | AI on the Ballot

←Back to Montana

Aaron Flint

U.S. House · Montana

Export Control and Compute GovernanceSupport

Military and National Security Uses of AINo mention

AI Regulation PhilosophyMixed

AI Companion ChatbotsNo mention

Children's Online SafetyNo mention

Data CentersMixed

Jobs and Workforce DisruptionNo mention

Deepfakes and AI FraudNo mention

AI PreemptionNo mention

Intellectual Property and AINo mention

3 positions on record

Hide "No Mention" entries

Export Control and Compute Governance

Government control or restriction of advanced AI capabilities through trade, export, or compute access.

SupportLow

Cautioned against "rivals like China and Russia" advancing beyond the US and controlling US data.

AI Regulation Philosophy

A candidate's general stance on regulating AI systems.

MixedMedium

Balances the importance of regulation with that of national security in public statements/

Data Centers

Positions on the development, regulation, or public impact of data center infrastructure as it relates to AI, including energy consumption and grid reliability concerns tied to AI workloads.

MixedHigh

Holds that "data centers need to be stopped if they're going to jack up electricity rates," but also emphasizes that it's "important for the US to maintain its technological position."

See an error? If candidate information is out of date or incorrectly coded, you can submit a correction for review.

Submit a correction Candidate clarification form

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

Methodology